Week9 - Refutation and Confession

My Refutation and Confession:

Obviously, my opinion is not the recognized study, despite being correct one. There are some people who will dispute my position with examples of normative models, computation ability in cognitive biological approach, and philosophers like Kant and Descartes. Of course, these arguments are all shortsighted and simply incorrect. First of all, normative models-have two types, deductive and inductive reasoning which recognize that humans have rationality-are not enacted by people in reality. While psychologists have studied that people ought to reason in a way of normative models, they also figured that people in real occasion behave depart from the normative models, rather they behave in a way of descriptive models which show how people react in actual situations. And this showed that people reason in self-egoistic way. Because we live in reality, not in idealistic world, we should focus on the second one which is descriptive model saying what people gonna do when the actual occasion occurs to them. Next, computation ability recognized in cognitive biological approach-means that humans' brains work like computer in computation, so it supposes that people will apply the same rule in judging themselves, objective and accurate-can be falsified by one of evidences which I offered to support my opinion. The problem of opposition is that it's too idealistic to be accepted, because all people are not a saint and might have experienced self-justification at least one time in their lives. For example, the placebo effect that patients get better with having counterfeited medicines is refuting the idea of human computational ability. So, the truth is that humans are subjective in looking themselves especially when they made some faults. Lastly, philosophers like Kant or Descartes-stated their opinions about humans defining that they are rational beings in reasoning and behaving, so that they always do pure and right things or so that they always think in the way of scientific styles which include deductive reasoning-are just two of so many philosophers who ever had existed studying humans minds and philosophy. There were also those who supported human empiricism which means that people are subjective in reasoning and judging something else. People might sometimes reason in objective way as opponents argue, but people not when the cases are applied to themselves. People are definitely subjective and generous to themselves, so that they try to justify their behaviors and beliefs in the cased of wrongdoing.